Anxiety theories -- a single trait -- multiple theorists
- a) unpleasant emotional state
- (1) subjective feelings of tension, apprehension, worry
- (2) activation or arousal of the autonomic nervous system
b) measures of anxiety
- (1) Manifest Anxiety Scale
- (2) State Trait scales
- (3) situational anxiety inventories
- (a) Test anxiety
- (b) math anxiety
2. Cattell/Spielberger -- traits and states
- a) Anxiety Trait versus Anxiety State
- (1) Cattell, Spielberger, etc.
- (a) Anxiety trait as a susceptibility to the state
- (b) but not necessarily frequency (anxiety trait as an avoidance of the state)
- (2) Components of state anxiety
- (a) 1) autonomic arousal/somatic tension
- (b) 2) worry -- attentional deficits
3. Hull-Spence -- drive theory and task difficulty
- (1) Hull-Spence theory of learning and performance
- (a) Reaction potential = Habit x (Drive + Incentive)
- (b) Habit strength reflects previous experience
- (c) Drive = … (non specific effects)
- i) {hunger, thirst, sex}
- ii) anxiety
- (2) Anxiety and learning
- (a) eyeblink conditioning
- (b) verbal learning of easy and hard lists
- (c) Spence, Farber and McFann (1956)
b) Anxiety, Drive, and the inverted U:
- (1) Broen and Storms --Hull-Spence theory with a ceiling
- (2) Broadbent: Drive and error types
- (a) Probability of response = f( sEr > criterion )
- (b) ==> low drive leads to errors of ommission
- (c) high drive leads to errors of commission
- (d) intermediate drive minimizes total errors
- (3) Easterbrook and cue utilization
- (a) cues vary in task relevance
- (b) central cues are task relevance
- (c) anxiety narrows range of cue utilization
c) Weiner and Schneider's comparison of anxiety, task difficulty, and feedback
- (1) task difficulty versus feedback
- (2) also evidence for carry over of motivation?
4. Mandler-Sarason-Wine-- attention allocation
- a) anxiety and attentional allocation
b) Anxiety as an inappropriate response
- (1) Sarason and test anxiety
- (a) "attention" is diverted to off task thoughts
- (b) should be able to redirect attention
- (2) Jeri Wine -- anxiety and attentional deficit
5. Atkinson-Birch --dynamic models
- (1) Anxiety and fear of failure
- (2) Resultant tendency is Tendency to approach - tendency to avoid
- (a) Tr = Tach - Taf = (Ms - Maf) Ps x (1- Ps)
b) Revised model
- (1) Instigating forces as function of Ms`
- (2) Inhibitory forces as function of Maf
- (3) Success reduces negaction (avoidance) as well as approach motivation.
- (4) Failure increases approach and avoidance motivation
- (5) Anxious people are more motivated to avoid failure than to seek reward, and thus are facilitated by success and hindered by failure.
- (6) Non anxious people are motivated to seek reward, and are facilitated by small amounts of failure.
6. M. W. Eysenck -- memory capacity
- a) working memory impairments
b) complex task deficits
7. MacLeod, Mathews -- attention and memory
- a) anxiety and selective attention
- (1) anxiety biases attention towards the threat cue
b) depression and differential encoding
8. Gray: BIS/BAS/FFS
- a) reformulation of Eysenck's model
- (1) Anxiety and the Behavioral Inhibition System (BIS)
- (2) Impulsivity and Behavioral Activation System (BAS)
- (3) Aggression and the Fight/Flight System (FFS)
b) Implications for current theory
9. Watson & Clark -- Anxiety, Depression, and Negative Affectivity
- a) Two dimensions of affective reactions
- (1) Negative affect
- (2) Positive affect
b) Anxiety as high NA, high tension
c) Depression as high NA, low PA