7# UUUUUcuuuu  xu 5f*UfKffffffff PEARSON CORRELATION MATRIX LABEXT LABNEUR MORNING EAMEAN EAALPHA LABEXT 1.000 LABNEUR -0.213 1.000 MORNING -0.150 0.032 1.000 EAMEAN -0.074 -0.429 0.108 1.000 EAALPHA 0.004 -0.197 -0.184 -0.070 1.000 TAMEAN -0.101 0.483 0.135 -0.479 -0.036 TAALPHA -0.318 0.211 0.107 0.199 0.108 EATACORR 0.146 -0.123 -0.001 0.014 0.077 EAACRO 0.342 -0.377 -0.429 -0.003 0.064 EATODFIT 0.153 -0.354 -0.135 0.178 0.346 TAACRO -0.003 0.091 0.188 -0.138 -0.113 TATODFIT 0.237 -0.104 -0.138 -0.155 0.289 Notice there is no relation between Extraversion and overall EA. Extraverts have relatively less consistency in reporting tense arousal? Extraverts have relatively late peaks of EA! Neurotics have relatively less overall EA and more overall TA. Neurotics have relatively early peaks of EA. ***Neurotics' daily EA rhythms show relatively less correspondence to a sinusoidal curve (My main hypothesis)*** Morning types have relatively early peaks of EA - that's good The overall means of EA and TA are negatively correlated (between subjects), however, the average EA-TA correlation is near zero (within subjects). All findings highlighted in bold are p<.05 TAMEAN TAALPHA EATACORR EAACRO EATODFIT TAMEAN 1.000 TAALPHA -0.107 1.000 EATACORR 0.064 -0.394 1.000 EAACRO -0.132 -0.194 0.245 1.000 EATODFIT -0.246 0.019 0.397 0.205 1.000 TAACRO -0.037 -0.057 0.467 -0.136 0.147 TATODFIT 0.169 -0.174 0.410 0.359 0.251 TAACRO TATODFIT TAACRO 1.000 TATODFIT -0.051 1.000 u -0.213 1.000 MORNING -0.150 0.032 1.000 EAMEAN -0 y~. @  hi)waK#PQ./mn./01{|< & ' ( N O m $ $ $ 4 Jim's Style60hLh    HH(FG(HH(d'@=/R@H -:LaserWriter New YorkCourierE E